Efficacy of pulmonary rehabilitation in patients with post-acute COVID-19
Citation
Hantal, A. O., Kayhan, S., Sagmen, S. B., & Soy, M. (2023). Efficacy of pulmonary rehabilitation in patients with post-acute COVID-19. European Review for Medical and Pharmacological Sciences, 27, 2117-2126.Abstract
OBJECTIVE: The most important
cause of mortality and morbidity of COVID-19 is
lung involvement. In this study, the effects of
pulmonary rehabilitation (PR) in the post-acute
COVID-19 period on lung functions, functional
capacity, dyspnea, quality of life, and psychiatric state were investigated.
PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients were
admitted to a PR program after discharge when
their general condition had stabilized. The patients’ scores of forced vital capacity (FVC),
forced expiratory volume in the first second
(FEV1), FEV1/FVC ratio, maximum vital capacity
(VCmax), peripheral arterial oxygen saturation
(PaO2), 6-minute walking distance (6MWD), Medical Research Council Dyspnea Scale (MRC), St.
George Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ), and
Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS)
before and after pulmonary rehabilitation were
compared. The patients were divided into three
groups, mild, moderate, and severe, according
to their thorax CT findings.
RESULTS: A total of 52 patients [mean age: 46.7
± 12.5 (range: 19-76) years] were included in the
study. Nineteen patients were in the mild group,
16 in the moderate group, and 17 patients comprised the severe group. Comparing the parameters before and after PR, significant improvement
was observed in all three groups in the evaluation
parameters after treatment including FVC, FEV1,
FEV1/FVC, 6MWD, and MRSC; SGRQ symptoms,
activity, effects and total scores; HADS depression, anxiety, and total scores (p<0.05 for all).
CONCLUSIONS: PR is a beneficial treatment
for patients with COVID-19 with lung involvement for improving lung functions, eliminating dyspnea, and improving functional capacity, psychological status, and life quality of the
patient.