Shear bond strength of composite to demineralized enamel conditioned with resin infiltration
dc.contributor.author | Durukan, Sebahat Melike | |
dc.contributor.author | Gümüştaş, Burak | |
dc.contributor.author | Sısmanoglu, Soner | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2025-02-06T18:07:13Z | |
dc.date.available | 2025-02-06T18:07:13Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2022 | |
dc.department | Altınbaş Üniversitesi | en_US |
dc.description.abstract | Aim: The aim of this in vitro study was to evaluate the influence of resin infiltration on bond-strength of composite resin to demineralized enamel. Methodology: Thirty bovine incisors were used in this study. Buccal enamel surfaces of bovine incisors were wet polished and then were divided into three groups: sound enamel; demineralized enamel; demineralized enamel infiltrated with a low-viscosity resin (ICON, DMG, Hamburg, Germany). After acid-etching with 37% phosphoric acid for 20 seconds, a two-step, total-etch adhesive (Single Bond 2, 3M ESPE, St. Paul, MN, USA) was applied using a microbrush for 20 seconds, followed by gentle air-drying for 5 seconds. The adhesive was light-cured for 10 seconds. Following the adhesive application, flowable composite resin (Filtek Supreme Flowable, 3M ESPE, St. Paul, MN, USA) was gently placed into a microtubule and was photopolymerized using an LED curing unit (Elipar Deep Cure; 3M ESPE, St. Paul, MN, USA). The microshear bond strength (µSBS) tests were performed using a microshear testing machine at a cross head speed of 0.5 mm/min. One-way ANOVA and Bonferroni tests were used to analyze the data (5%). Results: Significant differences were found according to the ANOVA (p < 0.05). Pair-wise comparison results of µSBS (mean ± SD) were: sound enamel (25.16 ± 2.3); demineralized enamel (17.93 ± 2.1); demineralized enamel infiltrated with a low-viscosity resin (28.51 ± 3.76). Conclusion: Resin infiltration applied to demineralized enamel before composite application increased the bond strength. No difference was found in the bond strength values obtained for sound enamel and resin infiltrated enamel. | en_US |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.5577/intdentres.441 | |
dc.identifier.endpage | 119 | en_US |
dc.identifier.issn | 2146-1767 | |
dc.identifier.issue | Supplement 1 | en_US |
dc.identifier.startpage | 114 | en_US |
dc.identifier.trdizinid | 1173426 | |
dc.identifier.uri | https://doi.org/10.5577/intdentres.441 | |
dc.identifier.uri | https://search.trdizin.gov.tr/tr/yayin/detay/1173426 | |
dc.identifier.uri | https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12939/5483 | |
dc.identifier.volume | 12 | en_US |
dc.indekslendigikaynak | TR-Dizin | |
dc.language.iso | en | en_US |
dc.relation.ispartof | International Dental Research | en_US |
dc.relation.publicationcategory | Makale - Ulusal Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanı | en_US |
dc.rights | info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess | en_US |
dc.snmz | KA_TR-Dizin_20250206 | |
dc.subject | Diş Hekimliği | en_US |
dc.subject | Farmakoloji ve Eczacılık | en_US |
dc.title | Shear bond strength of composite to demineralized enamel conditioned with resin infiltration | en_US |
dc.type | Article | en_US |