Olası İstanbul depremi ile yapılan kentsel dönüşüm çalışmaları ve alınan önlemlerin irdelenmesi
Yükleniyor...
Tarih
2021
Yazarlar
Dergi Başlığı
Dergi ISSN
Cilt Başlığı
Yayıncı
Altınbaş Üniversitesi
Erişim Hakkı
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
Özet
Kuzey Anadolu Fayı (KAF), sismik olarak dünyanın en hızlı hareket eden, en aktif faylarından birisini oluşturur.
1939 yılında Erzincan depremiyle başlayan ve 1967 yılına kadar devam eden büyük depremler dikkate
alındığında KAF üzerindeki depremlerin fay boyunca sistematik olarak doğudan batıya doğru göç ettiği
görülmüştür. Türkiye’nin en aktif faylarından biri olan KAF’nın doğu tarafı zamanında şiddetli depremlerle kırılıp
enerjisini boşaltmıştır. Fakat batı tarafında büyük bir deprem üretecek enerji birikmiştir. 1999 depreminden
sonra devlet ve sivil toplum kuruluşları böyle bir afet anı ile sonrasında vatandaşların daha az etkilenmesi için
bir dizi tedbirler almışlardı. Bunlar deprem sonrası vatandaşların toplanacağı alanlar ve acil müdahale için her
ilçeye konulması gereken doğal afet konteynırlarıdır. Türkiye gibi deprem kuşağında olan ülkelerde bu gibi
tedbirlerin alınması çok doğru ve yerinde bir karardır. Ancak daha önce belirlenen bu alanların tamamına
yakını günümüzde rezidans, alışveriş merkezi ve gökdelenlerle betonlaştırılarak yok edilmiştir. Mevcut olan
toplanma alanları ise afet sonrası vatandaşların toplanması için güvenli ve uygun değildir. Bu çalışma; Marmara
Denizi’ndeki devamının tek parça olduğu açıklanan ve ilerleyen zamanlarda kendini adeta kilitleyip ani bir
kırılma ile büyük bir deprem oluşturma ihtimali olan ve bunun sonucunda çok büyük can ve mal kayıplarına
sebep olabilecek bu fay hattı hakkında önemli hususları değerlendirmektir. Ayrıca yapılan kentsel dönüşüm
çalışmaları ile afet acil yolları ve deprem sonrası vatandaşların toplanacakları alanları açıklamak olacaktır
The North Anatolian Fault (NAF) is seismically one of the fastest moving and most active faults in the world. Considering the major earthquakes that started with the earthquake in Erzincan in 1939 and continued until 1967, it was seen that the earthquakes on the NAF systematically migrated from east to west throughout the fault. The east side of the NAF which is considered as one of the most active faults not only in Turkey but also in the World was broken with severe earthquakes and discharged itself. Nevertheless, an enormous amount of energy that will possibly create a huge earthquake has been accumulated on the west side. After the earthquake in 1999, the State and non-governmental organizations have taken a series of measures to reduce the impact of the disaster on the citizens. These are important issues such as the areas where citizens will be collected after the earthquake and natural disaster containers that should be placed in every district for emergency response. The adoption of such measures in the earthquake zone countries like Turkey is the fairly right and proper decision. However, nearly all of the places designated as the meeting areas have been destroyed by building residences, housing estates, shopping malls and skyscrapers for the sake of obtaining personal gain in recent years. The existing meeting areas are not safe and appropriate for the collection of citizens after a potential disaster as there are tall buildings around these places. The aim of this study is to evaluate the important issues about the fault line whose rest in the Sea of Marmara is explained as a whole part, which is likely to create a big earthquake with a sudden rupture and which can cause huge loss of life and property. In addition to this, related urban transformation studies and the areas where citizens will gather after a possible earthquake will be discussed.
The North Anatolian Fault (NAF) is seismically one of the fastest moving and most active faults in the world. Considering the major earthquakes that started with the earthquake in Erzincan in 1939 and continued until 1967, it was seen that the earthquakes on the NAF systematically migrated from east to west throughout the fault. The east side of the NAF which is considered as one of the most active faults not only in Turkey but also in the World was broken with severe earthquakes and discharged itself. Nevertheless, an enormous amount of energy that will possibly create a huge earthquake has been accumulated on the west side. After the earthquake in 1999, the State and non-governmental organizations have taken a series of measures to reduce the impact of the disaster on the citizens. These are important issues such as the areas where citizens will be collected after the earthquake and natural disaster containers that should be placed in every district for emergency response. The adoption of such measures in the earthquake zone countries like Turkey is the fairly right and proper decision. However, nearly all of the places designated as the meeting areas have been destroyed by building residences, housing estates, shopping malls and skyscrapers for the sake of obtaining personal gain in recent years. The existing meeting areas are not safe and appropriate for the collection of citizens after a potential disaster as there are tall buildings around these places. The aim of this study is to evaluate the important issues about the fault line whose rest in the Sea of Marmara is explained as a whole part, which is likely to create a big earthquake with a sudden rupture and which can cause huge loss of life and property. In addition to this, related urban transformation studies and the areas where citizens will gather after a possible earthquake will be discussed.
Açıklama
Anahtar Kelimeler
Deprem, Kuzey Anadolu Fayı, Türkiye’nin Depremselliği, Kentsel Dönüşüm, Deprem Toplanma Alanları, Earthquake, North Anatolian Fault, Turkey’s Seismicity, Urban Transformation, Earthquake Gathering Areas
Kaynak
AURUM Journal of Engineering Systems and Architecture
WoS Q Değeri
Scopus Q Değeri
Cilt
5
Sayı
1
Künye
Naimi, S., Tufan, T. (2021). Olası İstanbul depremi ile yapılan kentsel dönüşüm çalışmaları ve alınan önlemlerin irdelenmesi. AURUM Journal of Engineering Systems and Architecture, 5(1), 89-108.
