Optimizing the primary stability of dental implants in type IV bone: in-vitro comparison of machine-driven and ratcheting insertion protocols

Basit Öğe Kaydı
dc.contributor.authorTayşi, Nuri Mert
dc.contributor.authorTayşi, Ayşegül Erten
dc.contributor.authorErçal, Pınar
dc.contributor.authorŞişmanoğlu, Soner
dc.date.accessioned2025-05-22T08:34:00Z
dc.date.available2025-05-22T08:34:00Z
dc.date.issued2025
dc.departmentFakülteler, Diş Hekimliği Fakültesi, Ağız, Diş ve Çene Cerrahisi Ana Bilim Dalı
dc.description.abstractPurpose The objective of this study was to assess the effects of various implant insertion techniques on the primary stability of dental implants in both type II and type IV cadaveric bovine. Materials and Methods A total of 48 dental implants (BEGO Semados RSX, BEGO Implant Systems GmbH & Co. KG, Germany) with a diameter of 3.75 mm and a length of 12 mm were used in the experiments. Bovine bone ribs were adjusted to mimic type II and type IV bone characteristics. Following the preparation of recipient sites, implants were inserted using three different protocols: machine-driven insertion (Standard group, Std group), ratchet insertion (Ratcheted, R Group), and a combination of both (Std + R group). The Osstell® Beacon device was used to record the implant stability quotient (ISQ) of each implant immediately after insertion. Two-way analysis of variance and Bonferroni tests were used for statistical evaluation. Results Bone type significantly influenced the ISQ values (p<0.05). However, when comparing insertion protocols separately for type II and type IV bone, no significant differences were observed. In type IV bone, both the Std group and R group exhibited significantly lower ISQ values compared to the same groups in type II bone (p<0.05 for each). Nevertheless, there were no significant differences in the ISQ values when employing the Std+R technique between the two types of bone. Conclusion Combining machine-driven and ratchet insertion techniques may prove beneficial in optimizing ISQ values in bovine samples simulating type IV bone.
dc.identifier.citationTayşi, N. M., Tayşi, A. E., Erçal, P., & Şişmanoğlu, S. (2025). Optimizing the primary stability of dental implants in type IV bone: in-vitro comparison of machine-driven and ratcheting insertion protocols. European Oral Research, 59(1), 46-52.
dc.identifier.doi10.26650/eor.20241296069
dc.identifier.endpage52
dc.identifier.issn2630-6158
dc.identifier.issue1
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85219080776
dc.identifier.startpage46
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12939/5752
dc.identifier.volume59
dc.identifier.wosWOS:001422298200008
dc.identifier.wosqualityQ3
dc.indekslendigikaynakScopus
dc.institutionauthorTayşi, Ayşegül Erten
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherIstanbul University Press
dc.relation.ispartofEuropean Oral Research
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanı
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccess
dc.subjectDental implants
dc.subjectoral surgical procedures
dc.subjectosseointegration
dc.subjectresonance frequencyanalysis
dc.titleOptimizing the primary stability of dental implants in type IV bone: in-vitro comparison of machine-driven and ratcheting insertion protocols
dc.typeArticle

Dosyalar

Lisans paketi
Listeleniyor 1 - 1 / 1
[ X ]
İsim:
license.txt
Boyut:
1.17 KB
Biçim:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Açıklama:
İndir

Koleksiyon

Scopus İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu
Diş Hekimliği Fakültesi Yayın Koleksiyonu