Effect of desensitizers on the microleakage of previously restored Class V resin composite restorations

Basit Öğe Kaydı
dc.contributor.authorÖzsoy, Alev
dc.contributor.authorEren, Meltem Mert
dc.contributor.authorGürbüz, Özge
dc.contributor.authorDikmen, Benin
dc.contributor.authorÇilingir, Aylin
dc.contributor.authorErdemir, Uğur
dc.date.accessioned2021-05-15T12:37:25Z
dc.date.available2021-05-15T12:37:25Z
dc.date.issued2016
dc.departmentEren, Meltem Merten_US
dc.descriptionEren, Meltem Mert/0000-0002-5903-6636
dc.description.abstractObjectives: The aim of this in vitro study was to evaluate the effect of different desensitizers' application on the microleakage of previously restored Class V composite resin restorations. Materials and methods: Class V cavities were prepared on the buccal surfaces of 40 extracted human third molars. Forty box-shaped cavities were divided into four groups, based on the desensitizers used (n = 10). All teeth were restored with the same bonding agent and composite material. No desensitizer was applied in the control group. In the experimental groups, BisBlock, Gluma and Universal bonding agents were the desensitizers. The desensitizers were applied after completion of composite restorations according to manufacturers' instructions. All specimens were then thermocycled at 5-55 degrees C, with a 10-s dwell time for 500 cycles. The samples were then immersed in 0.5% methylene blue dye for 24 h, sectioned into two equal halves, evaluated for microleakage using a stereomicroscope at 30x magnification and scored on a scale of 0-3. The data were analysed using the Kruskal-Wallis test at the significance level p < 0.05. Results: There were no significant differences in microleakage after desensitizer application (p > 0.05). However, based on the obtained numerical values in our study, while the BisBlock and bonding groups showed lower microleakage at the occlusal margin, BisBlock, Gluma and bonding group showed lower microleakage at the gingival margin compared to the control group. Conclusions: The application of desensitizers as a post-treatment option could be considered an advisable procedure to minimize microleakage.en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1080/01694243.2016.1177319
dc.identifier.endpage2211en_US
dc.identifier.issn0169-4243
dc.identifier.issn1568-5616
dc.identifier.issue20en_US
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-84964528148
dc.identifier.scopusqualityQ2
dc.identifier.startpage2201en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1080/01694243.2016.1177319
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12939/533
dc.identifier.volume30en_US
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000379133600003
dc.identifier.wosqualityQ2
dc.indekslendigikaynakWeb of Science
dc.indekslendigikaynakScopus
dc.institutionauthorDiş Hekimliği Fakültesi
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherTaylor & Francis Ltden_US
dc.relation.ispartofJournal of Adhesion Science and Technology
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccessen_US
dc.subjectDesensitizeren_US
dc.subjectClass V Restorationen_US
dc.subjectResin Compositeen_US
dc.subjectMicroleakageen_US
dc.titleEffect of desensitizers on the microleakage of previously restored Class V resin composite restorations
dc.typeArticle

Dosyalar

Koleksiyon

WoS İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu
Diş Hekimliği Fakültesi Yayın Koleksiyonu
Scopus İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu