Comparison of restorative materials and surface alterations after prebiotic and probiotic beverages: A nanoindentation and SEM study

Basit Öğe Kaydı
dc.contributor.authorEren, Meltem Mert
dc.contributor.authorOzan, Gunce
dc.contributor.authorBilmez, Zuhal Yildirim
dc.contributor.authorGurcan, Aliye Tugce
dc.contributor.authorYucel, Yasemin Yucel
dc.date.accessioned2025-02-06T17:58:25Z
dc.date.available2025-02-06T17:58:25Z
dc.date.issued2022
dc.departmentAltınbaş Üniversitesien_US
dc.description.abstractThe purpose was to investigate the surface characteristics of various resin-based materials by immersing in probiotic beverages. A total of 420 disc-shaped samples (5 mm x 2 mm) were prepared from resin-based composites. Samples were divided into four groups and immersed for 10 min/day for 1 month in either a probiotic sachet, kefir, kombucha, or artificial saliva (control). Surface roughness was measured at baseline and 1 month. One sample of each of the tested materials was examined under nanoindentation to evaluate the reduced elasticity modulus and nanohardness scores. Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) was used to compare surface differences. Data were analyzed statistically using one-way ANOVA test and the significance was set at p < .05. The lowest roughness scores were observed in Z250, Estelite Bulk Fill, and HRi ENA in most of the test groups. Among conventional composites, Z250 group had the highest nanohardness and elasticity modulus scores. Among bulk-fill composites, Estelite Bulk Fill Flow had the lowest surface roughness after immersion in probiotic beverages and the highest nanohardness values. Reveal HD, as a bulk-fill group showed higher surface roughness and considerably lower nanohardness and elasticity modulus scores. Maximum height levels of samples were recorded. SEM images revealed voids and microcracks on the surfaces of test materials. Dentists may prefer Z250 as microhybrid and Estelite Bulk Fill Flow as bulk-fill composites for the restorations of patients who consume gut-friendly drinks regularly. When there are various types of materials, nanoindentation is a useful method for evaluating surface alterations and sensible comparisons.en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1002/jemt.23923
dc.identifier.endpage509en_US
dc.identifier.issn1059-910X
dc.identifier.issn1097-0029
dc.identifier.issue2en_US
dc.identifier.pmid34528737
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85114948676
dc.identifier.scopusqualityQ1en_US
dc.identifier.startpage499en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1002/jemt.23923
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12939/5243
dc.identifier.volume85en_US
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000696189900001
dc.identifier.wosqualityQ2en_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakWeb of Science
dc.indekslendigikaynakScopus
dc.indekslendigikaynakPubMed
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherWileyen_US
dc.relation.ispartofMicroscopy Research and Techniqueen_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccessen_US
dc.snmzKA_WOS_20250206
dc.subjectcomposite materialsen_US
dc.subjectelasticity modulusen_US
dc.subjectnanoindentationen_US
dc.subjectscanning electron microscopyen_US
dc.subjectsurface roughnessen_US
dc.titleComparison of restorative materials and surface alterations after prebiotic and probiotic beverages: A nanoindentation and SEM studyen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US

Dosyalar

Koleksiyon

WoS İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu
PubMed İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu
Scopus İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu