Detection of the glenoid bare spot by non-arthrographic MR imaging, conventional MR arthrography, and 3D high-resolution T1-weighted VIBE MR arthrography: comparison with CT arthrography

dc.contributor.authorÖzel, Mehmet Ali
dc.contributor.authorOğul, Hayri
dc.contributor.authorKöksal, Ali
dc.contributor.authorKöse, Mehmet
dc.contributor.authorTuncer, Kutsi
dc.contributor.authorEren, Suat
dc.contributor.authorKantarcı, Mecit
dc.date.accessioned2023-02-20T10:23:38Z
dc.date.available2023-02-20T10:23:38Z
dc.date.issued2023en_US
dc.departmentFakülteler, Tıp Fakültesi, Cerrahi Tıp Bilimleri Bölümü,Ortopedi ve Travmatoloji Ana Bilim Dalıen_US
dc.description.abstractObjectives To determine the diagnostic accuracy of non-arthrographic MR imaging, conventional MR arthrography, and 3D T1-weighted volumetric interpolated breath-hold examination (VIBE) MR arthrography sequences as compared with a CT arthrography in the diagnosis of glenoid bare spot. Methods A retrospective study of 216 patients who underwent non-arthrographic MR imaging, conventional MR arthrography, VIBE MRI arthrography, and CT arthrogram between January 2011 and March 2022 was conducted. The diagnostic accuracy of non-arthrographic MR imaging, direct MR arthrography, and VIBE MRI arthrography in the detection of glenoid bare spot was compared with that of CT arthrography. All studies were reviewed by 2 MSK radiologists. Interobserver agreement for MR imaging and MR arthrographic findings was calculated. Results Sixteen of 216 patients were excluded. Twenty-three of 200 shoulders had glenoid bare spot on CT arthrographic images. The glenoid bare spot was detected in 11 (47.8%) and 7 (30.4%) patients on conventional non-arthrographic MR images and in 18 (78.3%) and 16 (69.6%) patients on conventional MR arthrograms by observers 1 and 2, respectively. Both observers separately described the bare spot in 22 of 23 patients (95.7%) on 3D volumetric MR arthrograms. Interobserver variabilities were fair agreement for conventional non-arthrographic MR imaging (κ = 0.35, p < 0.05), moderate agreement for conventional MR arthrogram (κ = 0.50, p < 0.05), and near-perfect agreement for 3D volumetric MR arthrogram reading (κ = 0.87, p < 0.05). Conclusions A 3D high-resolution T1-weighted VIBE MR arthrography sequence may yield diagnostic performance that is comparable with that of CT arthrography in the diagnosis of glenoid bare spot.en_US
dc.identifier.citationÖzel, M. A., Oğul, H., Köksal, A., Köse, M., Tuncer, K., Eren, S., Kantarcı, M. (2023). Detection of the glenoid bare spot by non-arthrographic MR imaging, conventional MR arthrography, and 3D high-resolution T1-weighted VIBE MR arthrography: comparison with CT arthrography. European Radiology, 1-10.en_US
dc.identifier.endpage3285en_US
dc.identifier.issn0938-7994
dc.identifier.issn1432-1084
dc.identifier.issn0938-7994
dc.identifier.issue5en_US
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85148108504
dc.identifier.scopusqualityQ1
dc.identifier.startpage3276en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12939/3389
dc.identifier.volume33en_US
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000937953400001
dc.identifier.wosqualityQ1
dc.indekslendigikaynakWeb of Science
dc.indekslendigikaynakScopus
dc.indekslendigikaynakPubMed
dc.institutionauthorKöse, Mehmet
dc.institutionauthorTuncer, Kutsi
dc.language.isoen
dc.relation.ispartofEuropean Radiology
dc.relation.isversionof10.1007/s00330-023-09443-0en_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccessen_US
dc.subjectGlenoid Bareen_US
dc.subjectNon-Arthrographic MR Imagingen_US
dc.subject3D T1-Weighted Volumetric Interpolated Breath-Hold Examination (VIBE)en_US
dc.titleDetection of the glenoid bare spot by non-arthrographic MR imaging, conventional MR arthrography, and 3D high-resolution T1-weighted VIBE MR arthrography: comparison with CT arthrography
dc.typeArticle

Dosyalar

Lisans paketi
Listeleniyor 1 - 1 / 1
[ X ]
İsim:
license.txt
Boyut:
1.44 KB
Biçim:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Açıklama: