Laparoscopic repair vs open repair for perforated peptic ulcers: Quality of life assessment

Basit Öğe Kaydı
dc.authorid0000-0002-2710-4403en_US
dc.contributor.authorErtekin, Süleyman Çağlar
dc.contributor.authorÇetindağ, Özhan
dc.contributor.authorErgenç, Muhammer
dc.contributor.authorYeğen, Cumhur
dc.date.accessioned2024-10-08T07:15:58Z
dc.date.available2024-10-08T07:15:58Z
dc.date.issued2024en_US
dc.departmentFakülteler, Tıp Fakültesi, Cerrahi Tıp Bilimleri Bölümü,Genel Cerrahi Ana Bilim Dalıen_US
dc.description.abstractPurpose: Studies reporting patient-centered outcomes, including quality of life and satisfaction, in perforated peptic ulcer (PPU) treatment are insufficient. This study was designed to assess the relative efficacy of laparoscopic repair (LR) as opposed to open surgical repair (OR) in the treatment of and its impact on quality of life. Methods: This investigation performed a retrospective review of patients who underwent treatment for PPU at a secondary care hospital between January 2017 and April 2020. Patients were categorized into 2 separate groups according to the type of surgical procedure received: LR and OR. Comparisons were made based on a variety of factors, such as demographic data, intra- and postoperative metrics, pain control, patient contentment, and quality of life indicators. Results: In the analysis, there were no statistically significant differences in demographic or clinical characteristics between the LR (n = 35) and OR (n = 62) groups (P > .05). Conversely, the rates of incisional hernia and surgical site infection were significantly greater in the OR group (P < .05). Moreover, the LR exhibited benefits such as a shorter length of hospital stay (P < .05), more rapid resumption of a normal diet, and fewer surgical site infections-factors that contributed to a lower rate of overall postoperative complications. According to the quality-of-life questionnaire, the LR group exhibited significantly greater scores for physical function, role, pain, and general health by the 30th postoperative day (P = .003, P < .001, P = .006, and P = .001, respectively), and by the 1-year follow-up, the LR group showed substantial improvements in physical function, physical role, emotional role, pain and general health (P = .047, P = .004, P = .039, P = .001, and P = .021, respectively), indicating its effectiveness in patient recovery and quality of life enhancement after surgery. Conclusion: This study showed that LR could provide certain benefits in managing PPUs, such as reduced lengths of hospital stay and lower incidences of surgical site infections. Although LR reported promising directions in patient satisfaction and quality of life indicators, the limited duration of postoperative monitoring necessitates caution in broadly applying these results.en_US
dc.identifier.citationErtekin, S. Ç., Çetindağ, Ö., Ergenç, M., Yeğen, C. (2024). Laparoscopic repair vs open repair for perforated peptic ulcers: Quality of life assessment. Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery, 28(10), 1633-1638. 10.1016/j.gassur.2024.07.023en_US
dc.identifier.endpage1638en_US
dc.identifier.issn1091-255X
dc.identifier.issn1873-4626
dc.identifier.issue10en_US
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85200885399
dc.identifier.scopusqualityQ1
dc.identifier.startpage1633en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12939/4933
dc.identifier.volume28en_US
dc.identifier.wosWOS:001330836100001
dc.identifier.wosqualityQ2
dc.indekslendigikaynakWeb of Science
dc.indekslendigikaynakScopus
dc.indekslendigikaynakPubMed
dc.institutionauthorErtekin, Süleyman Çağlar
dc.language.isoen
dc.relation.ispartofJournal of Gastrointestinal Surgery
dc.relation.isversionof10.1016/j.gassur.2024.07.023en_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryDiğeren_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccessen_US
dc.subjectHealth-related quality-of-lifeen_US
dc.subjectLaparoscopyen_US
dc.subjectShort-Form-36en_US
dc.subjectUlcer perforationen_US
dc.subjectVisual analog scaleen_US
dc.titleLaparoscopic repair vs open repair for perforated peptic ulcers: Quality of life assessment
dc.typeReview Article

Dosyalar

Lisans paketi
Listeleniyor 1 - 1 / 1
[ X ]
İsim:
license.txt
Boyut:
1.44 KB
Biçim:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Açıklama:
İndir

Koleksiyon

PubMed İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu
Cerrahi Tıp Bilimleri Bölümü Koleksiyonu
Scopus İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu
WoS İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu