Comparative results of transurethral incision with transurethral resection of the prostate in renal transplant recipients with benign prostate hyperplasia

Basit Öğe Kaydı
dc.contributor.authorSarıer, Mehmet
dc.contributor.authorDuman, İbrahim
dc.contributor.authorKılıç, Süleyman
dc.contributor.authorYüksel, Yücel
dc.contributor.authorDemir, Meltem
dc.contributor.authorAslan, Mesut
dc.contributor.authorEmek, Mestan
dc.contributor.authorYücetin, Levent
dc.contributor.authorTekin, Sabri
dc.contributor.authorYavuz, Asuman Havva
dc.date.accessioned2021-05-15T12:42:33Z
dc.date.available2021-05-15T12:42:33Z
dc.date.issued2018
dc.departmentTıp Fakültesi, Üroloji Anabilim Dalıen_US
dc.descriptionSarier, Mehmet/0000-0002-8656-7416;
dc.description.abstractPurpose: The aim of this study is to compare the results of transurethral incision of the prostate (TUIP) and transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP) for the surgical treatment of benign prostate hyperplasia (BPH) in patients with renal transplantation. Materials and Methods: Between April 2009 and May 2016, BPH patients with renal transplants whose prostate volumes were less than 30 cm(3) were treated surgically. Forty-seven patients received TURP and 32 received TUIP. The patients' age, duration of dialysis, duration between transplant and TURP/TUIP, preoperative and postoperative serum creatinine (SCr), International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS), maximum flow rate (Qmax) and postvoid residual volume (PVR) were recorded. At 1-,6- and 12-month follow-up, early and long-term complications were assessed. Results were evaluated retrospectively. Results: In both groups, SCr, PVR and IPSS decreased significantly after the operation, while Qmax increased significantly (P < .001). There was no difference between the two groups in terms of increase in Qmax and decrease in IPSS, SCr and PVR (P = .89, P = .27, P = .08, and P = .27). Among postoperative complications, urinary tract infection (UTIs) and retrograde ejaculation (RE) rates were higher in the TURP group than the TUIP group (12.7% versus 6.2% and 68.1% versus 25%,respectively), whereas urethral strictures were more prevalent in the TUIP group (12.5% versus 6.3%). Conclusion: For the treatment of BPH in renal transplant patients with a prostate volume less than 30 cm(3) , both TUIP and TURP are safe and effective.en_US
dc.identifier.endpage213en_US
dc.identifier.issn1735-1308
dc.identifier.issn1735-546X
dc.identifier.issue4en_US
dc.identifier.pmid29464680
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85049742749
dc.identifier.scopusqualityQ3
dc.identifier.startpage209en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12939/949
dc.identifier.volume15en_US
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000441478500011
dc.identifier.wosqualityQ3
dc.indekslendigikaynakWeb of Science
dc.indekslendigikaynakScopus
dc.indekslendigikaynakPubMed
dc.institutionauthorSarıer, Mehmet
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherUrol & Nephrol Res Ctr-Unrcen_US
dc.relation.ispartofUrology Journal
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccessen_US
dc.subjectBenign Prostate Hyperplasiaen_US
dc.subjectRenal Transplantationen_US
dc.subjectTransurethral Resection Of Prostateen_US
dc.subjectTransurethral Incision Of Prostateen_US
dc.subjectTUIPen_US
dc.subjectTURPen_US
dc.titleComparative results of transurethral incision with transurethral resection of the prostate in renal transplant recipients with benign prostate hyperplasia
dc.typeArticle

Dosyalar

Koleksiyon

WoS İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu
Cerrahi Tıp Bilimleri Bölümü Koleksiyonu
PubMed İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu
Scopus İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu