Efficiency of self-adhering flowable resin composite and different surface treatments in composite repair using a universal adhesive

Basit Öğe Kaydı
dc.contributor.authorŞişmanoğlu, Soner
dc.date.accessioned2021-05-15T11:34:11Z
dc.date.available2021-05-15T11:34:11Z
dc.date.issued2019
dc.departmentDiş Hekimliği Fakültesi, Restoratif Anabilim Dalıen_US
dc.descriptionSismanoglu, Soner/0000-0002-1272-5581
dc.description.abstractAims: The aim of this in vitro investigation was to evaluate the efficiency of self-adhering flowable resin composite (Vertise Flow, Kerr, Orange, CA, USA) and different surface treatments in the repair microtensile bond strength (mu TBS) of aged nanofill resin composites using a universal adhesive. Materials and Methods: Aged substrates (x5000 thermocycling) were prepared using a nanofill (Filtek Ultimate; 3M ESPE) resin composite and randomly assigned to different surface treatments: (1) no treatment (control), (2) acid etching with 37% phosphoric acid, (3) Al(2)O(3)sandblasting, and (4) sandblasting with CoJet (3M ESPE). After surface treatment, specimens were further divided into two groups: no universal adhesive application and universal adhesive application. Vertise Flow was added to the substrates at 2-mm layer increments to a height of 5 mm and light cured. Restored specimens were sectioned to obtain 1.0-mm(2) beams for mu TBS testing. Data were analyzed with two-way analysis of variance and Tukey's honest significant difference tests (P < 0.05). Results: The lowest mu TBS values were recorded in the control and acid etching groups with no universal adhesive application (P < 0.05). Universal adhesive application significantly increased the repair mu TBS values of all surface treatments (P < 0.05), except CoJet treatment. There were no significant differences between Al(2)O(3)sandblasting, CoJet application, and acid etching groups with the universal adhesive application (P > 0.05). Conclusion: Vertise Flow can be used effectively in the repair of old nanofill resin composites. The usage of universal adhesive with prior acid etching to obtain acceptable repair performance would be the practical choice under clinical conditions.en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.4103/njcp.njcp_233_19
dc.identifier.endpage1679en_US
dc.identifier.issn1119-3077
dc.identifier.issue12en_US
dc.identifier.pmid31793473
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85076099302
dc.identifier.scopusqualityQ2
dc.identifier.startpage1675en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.4103/njcp.njcp_233_19
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12939/290
dc.identifier.volume22en_US
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000505722100007
dc.identifier.wosqualityQ3
dc.indekslendigikaynakWeb of Science
dc.indekslendigikaynakScopus
dc.indekslendigikaynakPubMed
dc.institutionauthorŞişmanoğlu, Soner
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherWolters Kluwer Medknow Publicationsen_US
dc.relation.ispartofNigerian Journal of Clinical Practice
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccessen_US
dc.subjectBond Strengthen_US
dc.subjectComposite Repairen_US
dc.subjectResin Compositesen_US
dc.subjectSandblastingen_US
dc.subjectUniversal Adhesivesen_US
dc.titleEfficiency of self-adhering flowable resin composite and different surface treatments in composite repair using a universal adhesive
dc.typeArticle

Dosyalar

Koleksiyon

WoS İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu
Diş Hekimliği Fakültesi Yayın Koleksiyonu
PubMed İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu
Scopus İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu