A validity and reliability study of the Turkish version of the ambivalent ageism scale

Basit Öğe Kaydı
dc.contributor.authorÖztürk, Ahu
dc.contributor.authorTosun, Leman Pınar
dc.contributor.authorÖzdemir, Gamze
dc.contributor.authorÇavuşoğlu, Merve
dc.contributor.authorAlparslan, Kenan
dc.contributor.authorPolat, Dilan
dc.contributor.authorKuşdil, Muharrem Ersin
dc.contributor.authorKarlıdağ, Sercan
dc.date.accessioned2021-05-15T11:33:56Z
dc.date.available2021-05-15T11:33:56Z
dc.date.issued2020
dc.departmentİktisadi, İdari ve Sosyal Bilimler Fakültesi, Psikoloji Bölümüen_US
dc.descriptioncavusoglu, merve/0000-0002-7295-0430; Alparslan, Kenan/0000-0001-6701-355X; KUSDIL, MUHARREM ERSIN/0000-0002-3005-9009; TOSUN, LEMAN PINAR/0000-0003-1635-6629
dc.description.abstractIntroduction: This study aimed to assess the psychometric properties of the Turkish version of the Ambivalent Ageism Scale, which measures 2 forms of ageism, namely benevolent and hostile ageism. Materials and Methods: Data were collected from 222 adults through an online survey. Participants completed Turkish versions of the 13-item Ambivalent Ageism Scale and the Implicit Association Test adapted for ageism. Construct validity was assessed through confirmatory factor analyses. Internal consistency and split-half consistency were also calculated. Criterion validity was assessed by correlating ambivalent ageism and its subscales with implicit ageism scores. Results: The results of confirmatory factor analysis of 12-items confirmed the original structure by exhibiting a good fit to the data (goodness of fit index = 0.93, p <.001, comparative fit index = 0.97, and root mean square error of approximation = 0.07). Internal consistency of the Ambivalent Ageism Scale and its 2 subscales were found to be satisfactory, with Cronbach's alpha being .89 for benevolent ageism (9 items), .79 for hostile ageism (3 items), and .89 for the total scale. Scale had a high split-half reliability coefficient (0.95). Implicit ageism positively correlated with ambivalent ageism (total score) and both benevolent ageism and hostile ageism (.22, .21, and .16, respectively). Except for cognitive assistance/protection, which was a sub-factor of benevolent ageism, no age and gender difference was found in any of the ageism scores. Conclusion: It was decided that the Turkish version of the Ambivalent Ageism Scale is a valid and reliable measure of negative attitudes toward older adults.en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.31086/tjgeri.2020.192
dc.identifier.endpage545en_US
dc.identifier.issn1304-2947
dc.identifier.issn1307-9948
dc.identifier.issue4en_US
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85099871573
dc.identifier.scopusqualityQ4
dc.identifier.startpage534en_US
dc.identifier.trdizinid458503
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.31086/tjgeri.2020.192
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12939/253
dc.identifier.volume23en_US
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000605365100015
dc.identifier.wosqualityQ4
dc.indekslendigikaynakWeb of Science
dc.indekslendigikaynakScopus
dc.indekslendigikaynakTR-Dizin
dc.institutionauthorKarlıdağ, Sercan
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherGunes Kitabevi Ltd Stien_US
dc.relation.ispartofTurkish Journal of Geriatrics-Turk Geriatri Dergisi
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessen_US
dc.subjectAgeismen_US
dc.subjectPrejudiceen_US
dc.subjectAttitudeen_US
dc.subjectReproducibility Of Resultsen_US
dc.titleA validity and reliability study of the Turkish version of the ambivalent ageism scale
dc.typeArticle

Dosyalar

Orijinal paket
Listeleniyor 1 - 1 / 1
Küçük Resim
İsim:
ahu.pdf
Boyut:
6.06 MB
Biçim:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Açıklama:
Tam Metin/ Full Text
İndir

Koleksiyon

WoS İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu
Psikoloji Bölümü Koleksiyonu
Scopus İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu
TR-Dizin İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu