Impact of peri-implant bone resorption, prosthetic materials, and crown to implant ratio on the stress distribution of short implants: A finite element analysis

dc.contributor.authorErçal, Pınar
dc.contributor.authorTaysı, Ayşegül Erten
dc.contributor.authorAyvalıoğlu, Demet Cağıl
dc.contributor.authorEren, Meltem Mert
dc.contributor.authorŞişmanoğlu, Soner
dc.date.accessioned2021-05-15T11:33:13Z
dc.date.available2021-05-15T11:33:13Z
dc.date.issued2021
dc.departmentDiş Hekimliği Fakültesi, Ağız Cerrahisi Anabilim Dalıen_US
dc.description.abstractThe purpose of this study was to determine the effects of prosthetic materials and crown/implant (C/I) ratio on short implants with a marginal bone resorption. Three-dimensional finite element analysis was used to simulate stress distribution under static loading in non-resorption and resorption scenarios (3-mm vertical bone loss) in implants restored with single crowns and C/I ratios of 1:1, 1.5:1, and 2:1 were evaluated. Different crown materials were used: porcelain-fused to metal, porcelain-fused to zirconia, monolithic zirconia, and zirconia-based crown veneered with indirect composite resin. The C/I ratio, the peri-implant bone resorption, and the loading conditions were the key factors affecting the generated stress in short implants. In non-resorption models, von Mises stress ranged between 50 and 105 MPa whereas in resorption models, the values ranged from 168 to 322 MPa, both increasing with the higher C/I ratio under oblique forces. Under axial loading, the C/I ratio did not influence the stress values as the presence of resorption was the only parameter increasing, 57 MPa for the non-resorption models and 101 MPa for the resorption models, respectively. Preference of a prosthetic material was ineffective on the distribution of stress in the bone and implant structure under static loading in any models. The peri-implant bone resorption and a higher C/I ratio in short implants increase the stress values under both axial and oblique forces, whereas the crown material does not influence stress distribution in the surrounding bone and implant structure.en_US
dc.description.sponsorshipAltinbasUniversity Scientific Research Funding [PB2017/2]en_US
dc.description.sponsorshipThis project was supported by the AltinbasUniversity Scientific Research Funding (Grant Number: PB2017/2).en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1007/s11517-021-02342-w
dc.identifier.issn0140-0118
dc.identifier.issn1741-0444
dc.identifier.pmid33728596
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85102924346
dc.identifier.scopusqualityQ2
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1007/s11517-021-02342-w
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12939/101
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000629497300002
dc.identifier.wosqualityQ2
dc.indekslendigikaynakWeb of Science
dc.indekslendigikaynakScopus
dc.indekslendigikaynakPubMed
dc.institutionauthorErçal, Pınar
dc.institutionauthorTaysı, Ayşegül Erten
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherSpringer Heidelbergen_US
dc.relation.ispartofMedical & Biological Engineering & Computing
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccessen_US
dc.subjectDental Implantsen_US
dc.subjectImplant Prosthesisen_US
dc.subjectCrown Restorationen_US
dc.subjectBone Resorptionen_US
dc.subjectFinite Element Analysisen_US
dc.titleImpact of peri-implant bone resorption, prosthetic materials, and crown to implant ratio on the stress distribution of short implants: A finite element analysis
dc.typeArticle

Dosyalar